Free Backlink Gap Analysis Tool
Compare your backlinks against up to three competitors and see the referring domains linking to them but not to you. Full results, no account, nothing held back behind a sign-up.
How the backlink gap analysis works
Three steps, and domain names are the only input:
Enter your domain
Add one to three competitors
Work the list
What a backlink gap actually is
The gap is the set of sites willing to link to companies like yours that have not linked to you yet. It is the most directly actionable list in link building.
Auditing your own backlinks tells you where you stand. It does not tell you what is available, because the sites missing from your profile are invisible by definition. A backlink gap analysis inverts that: it starts from a competitor's profile, removes everything you already have, and leaves the difference.
That difference matters because of what it proves. A site that has already linked to a company in your field has demonstrated three things at once: it links out at all, it covers your subject, and it considers companies like yours worth mentioning. A site that has never linked to anyone in your industry has demonstrated none of them. The gap list is therefore pre-qualified in a way that a list of sites in your niche is not.
This is also why the tool asks for your domain rather than inferring it. Removing your existing referring domains is the entire point. Without that step you get a competitor backlink list, which is a different and less useful thing, and one our backlink checker already does on its own.
Why more competitors means fewer results
This tool runs an intersection, not a union. It is worth understanding before you read the list, because it behaves in the opposite way to most filters.
With one competitor, the results are every referring domain they have and you do not. Add a second and the list shrinks to domains linking to both of them. Add a third and it shrinks again, to domains linking to all three.
Most tools widen as you add inputs, so this catches people out. The reason it works this way is that the narrower list is the more useful one. A site that links to every competitor in your field and not to you is close to a guaranteed opportunity, whereas a site that linked to one of them once might have done so for reasons you cannot reproduce.
- 1Start with your single closest competitor. This gives the longest list and the widest view of what is available.
- 2Add a second competitor when the first list is too long to work through. What survives is stronger.
- 3Use all three when you want a short list of near-certain targets rather than a long list of possibilities.
- 4If a three-competitor run returns nothing, that is a normal result rather than an error. Drop back to one.
Reading the results
Four columns, and the one people ignore is usually the one that decides whether an opportunity is real.
Strength
Spam score
Competitors linking
Links
Which gaps are worth pursuing
Most of a gap list is not actionable. Sorting it takes a few minutes and saves a great deal of wasted outreach.
| Signal | Worth the effort | Usually not |
|---|---|---|
| Relevance | The site covers your field | An unrelated general directory |
| How the competitor got it | A roundup, a listing, a review you could also be in | A press story, a funding announcement, an acquisition |
| Size | A site you could plausibly reach | A national newspaper |
| Spam score | Clean, or low enough to explain | Risky, whatever the rank says |
| Reach | Links to every competitor you listed | Links to one, and only recently |
What to do with the list
A gap list is a research output, not an outreach list. The step between the two is where most link building stalls.
- 1Open the linking page, not just the domain. How a competitor earned the link decides whether you can earn the same one, and a directory listing, a roundup post and an editorial mention need three different approaches.
- 2Discard anything you could not plausibly reach. Press coverage of a funding round is not an opportunity, and neither is a national publication.
- 3Check what the linking page is actually about. If it is a roundup you could be added to, that is the cheapest link on the list.
- 4Work out what you would offer. A site that lists eight competitors will add a ninth if the listing is easy to justify, and will ignore an email that gives it no reason to.
- 5Track what you win, and re-run the gap in a few months. Competitors keep earning links, so the gap regenerates.
The last point is the one that catches people. A gap analysis is a snapshot of one day. The list you build from it is out of date the moment a competitor earns their next link, which is why the useful version of this exercise is a repeated one rather than a one-off audit. Pair it with competitor keyword research and a domain rating check to see whether the sites you are targeting are within reach in the first place.
Backlink gap analysis FAQ
How to do backlink gap analysis?
What are the four types of gap analysis?
Do backlinks still matter in 2026?
How can I analyse my backlinks?
Why does adding a competitor give me fewer results?
Why is this limited to three checks a day?
The tool found no gap at all. Is that a problem?
Millions of people will ask AI about your category this week
RankSpot researches, writes and publishes daily, and sends you the short list of what's left. Free for 3 days.
Start free trial
